On the Soapbox: November 2003 Archives

Inequality. Unfair benefits! I want to know why Federal employees are not covered by the same Medicare plan that they foist off on the rest of us? I'd like to see ONE health plan for all Americans. Since coverage is better for federal employees....I want to be covered by THAT policy!

Of course, the next question is, how do we get them to do it?

Another issue I'd like to see addressed is the pension the legislators "earn." Awarding a person a pension for life without regard to length of service is a gross misuse of funds. Each year I get a note from Social Security about what they will pay me IF I continue to work until I'm 70. Medicare is afraid to do the same sort of mailing because it's likely the legislators will have spent everything before it's time for me to retire!

Perhaps we need to consider one year of reimbursement for each year served. And perhaps we need to average their income over that time, rather than basing the pension on the salary of the last year in office. Our government is like a good old boys club, with members voting in as many freebies and benefits as they can, despite the fact that we are just beginning to rise out of a recession. They are handing out golden parachutes right and left, when people barely above poverty level are being taxed to pay for those benefits.

Dear Abby reprinted these statistics from the American Cancer Society today. They tell a compelling story.

"When smokers quit, the benefits begin immediately. Twenty minutes after the last cigarette, blood pressure drops to a level close to that before the last cigarette. Eight hours after quitting, carbon monoxide levels in the blood drop to normal. Twenty four hours later , the chance of heart attack decreases.

After one to nine months, coughing, sinus congestion, fatique and shortness of breath decrease, and cilia regain normal function in the lungs, increasing the ability to handle mucus, clean the lungs and reduce infection. One year later, excess risk of coronary heart disease is half that of a smoker's.

After five years, stroke risk is reduced to that of a non-smoker. After ten years, the lung cancer fatality rate is about half that of a smoker's and the risk of oral, throat, esophageal, bladder, kidney and pancreatic cancer also decreases."

I brought these statistics to you because my sister was diagnosed with lung cancer. Her doctor didn't even let her go home. Two days later she was recuperating from having the lower third of her right lung removed. I'm delighted to tell you that she is (at least) an eight year survivor. The important thing is, that she lived to see all three of her sons become dads.

Her experience has helped almost everyone in my family to quit smoking. When we built our home we announced that it was a non-smoking area. My mother would stand out in the semi-enclosed entryway to smoke, even during the coldest winter weather. When my sister had her surgery, Mother made the decision to quit.

I have had asthma due to allergies almost all my life. For me, the trend toward not smoking is one of the best things that could have happened. My family always made sure to seat me upwind of their smoke, but that doesn't eliminate second hand smoke.

November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month, and today is the 27th Great American Smokeout. If you smoke, I hope you tried to do without them today. It could be the best thing you'll ever do for yourself....and your loved ones!

This morning I was listening to the third installment of the Petulant Politics of Illinois. We have a zealous young governor, Rod Blagojevich (BLAH-GOY-A-VITCH to the uninitiated), who was saddled with a 5 billion dollar deficit in the state budget when he took office. Of course his primary concern is cost cutting.

Well, he's been initiated to the real world of budgeting, now. FOr example, it seems that agreement had been reached concerning funding for the office of the Secretary of State, but at some point, the legislature decided to add an extra five million to that figure. The Governor is up in arms, saying that the legislature is spending the public's money like "a bunch of drunken sailors." One legislator took offense, and said he'd never been a sailor!

A budget was agreed upon last Spring, and the legislature adjourned for the summer. During the summer the Governor cut additions that he felt were special interest in nature. When the legislature returned for the two week fall veto session, they began restoring that funding to the budget.

There's a good explanation of the situation at this site.

I was cutting down the peonies today, and I never garden without listening to the radio. The news was on, and I was sort of paying attention to the report. I'm sure that I heard them say that the Illinois General Assembly voted today not to give illegal aliens legal driver's licenses.

First of all, why in the world were they voting on this issue?? When we have such pressing matters concerning the residents of this state, why are we at all concerned with documenting someone who is here illegally? And WHY are we not packing them off to detention when they apply?

I know.....to be politically correct I should be calling them undocumented persons. In these times when we are so concerned about "Undocumented persons" within our borders, what possible reason could we have to discuss giving them legal driver's licenses??

Please tell me that I heard that wrong, that I missed the boat, and that I need to apologize. Otherwise, it's time to vote the jerks OUT!

I was truly aggravated this evening to be shown over and over a sobbing relative of the military personnel lost in Iraq yesterday.

When did someone decide that it was appropriate to intrude on these people in their time of grief? What makes the TV stations feel that it's NEWS to tightly focus on a woman who has just lost her son? Why do they send reporters out to stand on the lawn and comment on the serviceman's home?

I just don't understand this approach to news. I think it stinks! If they are newsworthy, then approach them in a few weeks, when they have had a chance to deal with the first rush of loss. Don't push your way into their homes and harass them in the hope of raising your ratings. Both network news and local news ought to be more circumspect. We don't need our newsrooms sinking to the level of a Jerry Springer show.

If the families are newsworthy, give them time to grieve, and then make a podium available to them. Otherwise you're exploiting them.