On the Soapbox: April 2003 Archives

Showers

|

...not not the weather kind, the bridal kind...or ANY kind of shower along those lines. I think whoever created the 20th century concept of showers should be taken out and SHOT!!!

I have to go to my step-daughter's bridal shower today. First, let me say that I am delighted to be celebrating her coming nuptuals. She's found a swell guy to marry. I'm pleased to be able to give her a gift that I know she will like. I don't have any problems with brides being registered, or the the idea that we are gathering to give her household items (or lingerie, or cooking tips, etc.).

What really bugs me is the stupid games! My sisters were rather busy procreating, so I was invited to bridal showers, baby showers, eight grade, high school and college graduations, and then bridal showers for my nieces and future nieces-in-law and baby showers and so on. At all the wedding oriented activities, women get together and play the silliest games, all for the purpose of distributing token gifts to the participants. I finally tried to beg off on some of those showers, but it never worked.

This is my idea of a great shower: NO GAMES. Maybe you could organize a pot luck supper, or go out to eat, and then open gifts. NO GAMES!! Sitting and chatting, or putting together a personal book of recipes, but NO GAMES!!!! Going out to a Chippendale performance and having a drink or two, then sending the bride home to open the gifts the next day, but NO GAMES!!!!!

<muttering as I walk away........no gamesnogamesnogames>

Generosity Begins At Home

| | Comments (2)

Earlier this month, when the U.S. government was voting on the President&#8217;s budget, I think I heard that we were giving a BILLION&#8230;.that&#8217;s right a billion with a &#8220;b&#8221;&#8230;.dollars each to Jordan, Israel and the Philippines. Unfortunately, our largess didn&#8217;t stop there, but those three caught my attention.

I would be the first to admit that I am not well versed in international politics. I know that administrations prior to this one have paid out huge sums in an effort to shore up friendly countries, or to try to bribe unfriendly ones into seeing us more favorably. It seems to me that most of that has backfired and left us with a large part of the world assuming that there will be never-ending handouts. Despite our generosity, we are now hated across the world.

I don&#8217;t understand why we are giving such large amounts to these countries. What have they done that warrants us supporting them? Are we paying Israel because it kept out of the war and kept a low profile? And why are we supporting the Philippines? I just don&#8217;t understand. Even more, I object to the blackmail coming from North Korea. &#8220;Pay us, or we&#8217;ll send a nuclear suitcase bomb to you!&#8221;

We&#8217;ve helped to free Afghanistan from the tyranny over there, and we&#8217;re told that if we don&#8217;t rebuild their country faster, they will let the tyrants back in. What ever happened to the concept of pulling yourself up by your bootstraps? That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve done. It&#8217;s how we&#8217;ve become the success that we are. Generations of Americans have worked long hours, and saved pennies, and done without until they could afford things. What&#8217;s wrong with applying that same concept in other places?

At the grocery store where I shop, there are men who hold up signs saying that they will work for food. A man who shops when I shop, will invite them to come in with him, and then he buys them meals and juice or milk. He does this to be sure that the money he gives is used for food, and not siphoned away for drugs or alcohol. This is generosity that I can understand.

With countries, I&#8217;d like to see us send food or medicine or technology, rather than cash. I realize that some places are in such dire straits that they need help to feed their people, but once the populace is stabilized, we need to assist them in ways that will make them independent. We don&#8217;t need to collect satellites; we need to create partners in a healthy economy.

Or, and this is a thought&#8230;..we might keep the money and start taking care of our own problems. We could see to it that students in poor school districts received a quality education, or we could subsidize more college education. We could provide basic health insurance for those who currently have no coverage. We could provide temporary shelter for the indigent, or create training programs for those on welfare. We could even recreate a Works Progress Authority to rebuild our deteriorating infrastructure. We would create jobs, train people, and improve our situation.

I suppose that those who are involved with politics or government will have dozens of reasons why we can&#8217;t do this, but I think that they are geared to the status quo and are unwilling to see that we have other options. We need fresh thinking in our government, and some new direction, and I hope we can bring about a better reputation for our country, too.

I don&#8217;t have the answers, but I can see the need for change.

Monthly Archives

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.32-en

Word of the Day

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the On the Soapbox category from April 2003.

On the Soapbox: May 2003 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.