« Leftovers | Main | Storms a Coming »

What's Important to YOU?

I never talk about politics. I feel that you could elect any of the people who have run in the past few years, and they would, for the most part, be carbon copies of each other. I'm not sure why we even have a two party system. No candidate wants to make a statement that could loose him votes, so there's very little discussion or debate of solid issues. I'm astonished that the present candidates have agreed to have four debates. I'd like to see the list of requirements that had to be met before the debates could take place.

If you could create the candidate of your choice, what issues would he have to address? Here's a list of some topics that matter to voters:

Our presence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia etc.
Homeland Security
The Economy
Affordable Health Insurance
Social Security
Pro Choice or Pro Life
Gay rights
Prayer in School, "God" in courtrooms and on money

What issues must your candidate support? Recently I heard a man say that he'd like the candidates to explain why we spend half a billion a week to support five other nations, when his family of six had NO health insurance.

Supporters of the war in Iraq have various reasons for us continuing to be a presence. Some want to see a democratic government installed, and others want to be sure that they can get the oil they need for business. Some want to prevent Iraq from being a stronghold for terrorism, and others want to free those who have been terrorized by their own government. For whatever reason, this is a HOT issue.

We will always be a nation divided on the subject of abortion. I fail to understand how someone Pro-Life can justify killing doctors who perform abortions. While I doubt that I would have ever been able to have an abortion, I strongly believe that a woman should have the right to determine what happens within her body. And, having said that, I'd work to prevent women from using abortion as birth control. I know, I'm conflicted on this issue, but I think of myself as Pro-Choice.

Gay Rights is another hot button. I'd like to know just how many gay people there are in the U.S. Either there is a lot of them, or they have just become very vocal about their treatment by the government, and I can't blame them wr wanting change. I don't understand how the government can refuse them the same services and benefits that heterosexual couples have. The constitution doesn't support the rules the government has put in place.

The DJ I listen to in the morning said that Homeland Security is most important. He feels that you have to be alive for any of the others to matter, so he ranks that as his most important choice.

I'm still trying to decide. I'd like to take bits and pieces of all the Presidents who have served during my life, and some who served before I was born and roll them together into the perfect candidate. I want someone who is honest, moral, strong in the face of adversity, a great diplomat, and good at foreign affairs. He or she would have to find a way to care for the poor in our own country, to educate anyone who wanted to go to school, and make health care affordable. He'd have to find a way to keep us safe from terrorists, without closing us off from the rest of the world. And he would have to resist the pull of power. "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton.

Unfortunately, the paragon of virtue I just described doesn't exist, so I have to choose from lesser candidates, and it means that I'll have to sift through the issues and decide which of them are most important to me. It's going to be another tough election.

Comments (6)

Cop Car:

Some of the issues that you've listed make the selection of a president ever-so-important this year because he will in all probability be appointing more than one justice to the supreme court. This power, alone, makes me stop to think--HARD!

Buffy:

A president who has the chance to appoint a supreme court justice can affect the direction in which the court moves for decades. I find the thought of a president packing a court, scary.

Buffy:

It's worse than I thought! I just followed a link at Eagle Eye View, that talks about Bush's attempts to strip women of the rights that have been hard earned over the past 50 years.

Did you know that Dubya signed a bill that prohibits a woman serving in the military in Iraq from getting an abortion, even if she was raped, or even if she chooses to pay for it herself? Go visit Eagle Eye View and click on the link in her October 13 post. Read the article, and then encourage every woman you know to vote!

Buffy:

Clarification:

This subject bothered me so much that I surfed to find this information:

"Currently,[5/23/2003] women stationed overseas and military dependents are not able to obtain abortions at military health facilities, even with private funds, except in cases of rape or (word deleted to satisfy Moveable Type guidelines) - which must be paid for with private funds. This policy discriminates against US servicewomen or female military dependents just because they are stationed overseas, as noted by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA). It also endangers the health of women overseas by forcing those who need an abortion to seek what could be unsafe or illegal services in the host country. In addition, the privacy of these women could be at stake if they are forced to tell a military superior that they need an abortion and therefore need a flight back to the United States, according to PPFA.

Abortion rights supporters in Congress have offered similar amendments on an annual basis since 1996. The ban, which was put into effect by Congress in 1988, was lifted for two years under the Clinton administration but reinstated by Congress in 1996."
http://www.feminist.org/news/newsbyte/uswirestory.asp?id=7811

The ban originated prior to the present Mr. Bush's term, and applies to military health facilities.

My apologies for diseminating incorrect information, but my sense of outrage remains. Women who serve in the military should have the same rights abroad as they do at home, and so should the families of military men.

honestly, getting a new president/country leader/prime minister is like buying a new home --- you just want to take bits and pieces of them, as the houses I have seen --- there is no perfect one, they all have faults, some more obvious than others.

Buffy:

I totally agree, Desiree! I don't know if I've come to know my mind better as I've matured, or if my needs have changed, or if media has had too great an effect on how we elect our leaders, or if the CANDIDATES have changed. It could be one or all of those things. But, I can tell you that I'm very unhappy with the choices we have been given.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 12, 2004 1:37 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Leftovers.

The next post in this blog is Storms a Coming.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.